Archive for May, 2007

Understanding The Metrics…

Posted by inferno272 on May 12th, 2007

Starting in the next day or so I will begin my post season evaluation of our roster, one player at a time. I will be rating the players on a given set of metrics listed below, then giving my evaluation, and verdict. Big thanks to Chimp, and the rest of the HFBoards for some advice on what metrics to use. Also, I plan on on doing the players who have played enough games to get an adequate sample size to make these judgements. Guys like Immonen, Dawes, Liffiton, Dubinsky, etc, simply haven’t been seen enough.

Players

Shooting: Slappers, onetimers and wristshots, shooting power and accuracy all added together.
Passing: Basically how often the player’s passes lead to danger for the other team and how seldom the player doesn’t screw up.
Skating: Speed and agility added together.
Stickhandling: How good is he in one on one situatoins and deking his way through tough spots? How tough is it to take away the puck from the player? Can he make the opponent goalie go buy a hot dog on a breakaway?
Offensive skill/awareness: Eye for the game, vision to find the perfect pass or shot, reading the play.
Defensive skill/awareness: Being in the right position all the time, reading the play in the defensive zone. Pokecheck included.
Physical play: Ability to use the body, battling around the boards, clearing the crease. Does the player dish out highlight hits or more just brush his shoulder against the opponents?
Heart: Self confidence, never giving up, ability to show up when it matters the most.
Athleticism: How much can the player play without tiring?
Intensity: Does the player pant heavily after a shift and look like he has his skates on fire on the ice? How often does he backcheck?
Net play: Ability to screen the goalie, deflect the puck and take care of rebounds. Willingness to crash the net.
Grittiness: Does the player eat barb wire for breakfast or what? Can he take a punch/hit for the team and give a punch/hit for the team? Willingness to block that slapper that will hurt like hell and not complain about it even if it breaks two ribs.
Aggressiveness: Is the player calm or vocal on and off the ice? Does he curse and destroy a door after a loss, or just sighing?

Goalies

Positioning: Always being at the right spot, never having to make that highlight save because he was in good position all the time.
Stickhandling: Ability to pass the puck with the stick, throwing open ice passes to the other blueline, play behind the net. Ability to never cover the puck unless necessary.
Puckhandling: Ability to smother the puck, never letting out rebounds.
Agility: Lateral movement, reflexes, easily going into splits.
Glove coverage: Are the opponents laughing at or fearing that glove?
Blocker coverage: Does the opponent coach tell the players to shoot or not shoot high on the blocker side?
Ice coverage: Do the opponents want to shoot through the five hole and along the ice or avoid it?
Aggressiveness: Is the goalie calm or vocal, on and off the ice?IDoes he curse and destroy a door after a loss, or just sighing?
Athleticism: How strong is the goalie, how’s his ability to get back into position and recover from a shot and how much can the goalie play withouth needing a rest?
Vision: Do the commentators say “How did he see that puck through all those players?” or do they more often say “It looks like he didn’t see it coming.”? Ability to ignore screens by constantly being able to see the puck.
Heart: Self confidence, never giving up, ability to show up when it matters the most.

All metrics will be graded on a 0-100 scale, and I’ll try to have graphs and averages in there as well.

When September Ends…

Posted by inferno272 on May 10th, 2007

Just watch…

-Inferno

How can you not be proud of this team? They battle tooth and nail, and never say die. I will have a comprehensive writeup later tonight (gotta talk with fellow Yankee fans about Clemens at the moment). I hope you guys enjoyed the ride. I know I sure did!

Join in with your fellow Ranger fans and salute this team.

Update:
Ok, so I have had some time to sit back and reflect, and I figure, now is not the time to encapsulate this season. It is probably more prudent to just look back at this game, as I have done all year, and leave that for another time. In that spirit I have sort of mapped out how I want to run this site this offseason (of course you should be coming here at least once a week as I plan to have posts every other day or so). First I will do a player by player review, analyzing certain matrices of a good player, and rating their individual seasons based on what I see out there rather than cold hard fact. My goal is to start day after tomorrow with Michal Rozsival, and continue all the way till I reach Nylander (going by jersey number). Once I do that I plan to analyze the coaches, the season as a whole, then the wolfpack. Hopefully that will carry us through till draft day, then till the signing period, and so on. In short, it will be a busy offseason here at Rangers Review, so don’t delete that bookmark juuuuuust yet.

So, with regards to the final game of our season, how did it go? Well, it was kind of a seesaw.

see-saw

The first period was more or less even, despite the Sabres holding most of the play, the Rangers took the lead, hence the evenness. The second was entirely the Sabres as they outscored the Rangers 4-1 in that period alone, and the 3rd was clearly all Rangers. Just like this entire series, this game could have gone either way. It’s hard to call the Rangers out for 1 bad period, but really that is what it boiled down to. They thought they could play the Sabres style, and it blew up in their faces. As Sam Weinman mentioned, it looked like they were trying to do too much, which was causing them to be out of position, and causing rushes the other way with numbers.

Remember my pre-game words of wisdom?

Play smart, stay within yourself, and leave it all on the ice…

Sadly the rangers didnt do any of these things, save the last. They certainly tried hard at the end, but they didnt really give it their all from the get go. It’s hard to blame them, game 5 was just brutal for them to take, but it’s hockey, and you have to move on.

I am not going to recap the series, its not really worth your while, I mean, we all know how this series could have been OVER in game 5, we all know how badly the reffing screwed us this series, we all know the Rangers played with pride, and nearly overcame all obstacles.

This is why I am please with the outcome, and this is why, we salute you.

Rangers Game 6 Stick Salute

-Inferno

Rangers played the Sabres game, and got roasted. Idiotic play in the second period. Theyve been flat, theyve been stupid, theyre getting killed out there. Not surprising given the way they lost game 5.
-Inferno

The score probably should be something like 3 or 4 to nothing Sabres. They are ALL over us, with a relentless forecheck and some really hard work shifts. We, on the other hand, have looked flat and passive. Henrik had to be brilliant, and he was. This kid is nothing short of the best goaltender in the world right now.

What a goal by Nylander. Day before yesterday I was commenting on how Drurys goal, while clutch, was not really a difficult play. I was killed for saying that, but I stand by what I said. Nylander on the other hand did a helluva move to score his goal. Nice little backhand play showcasing some amazing hands. Drury….falls on your stick, and puts it in. Nylander, falls on your stick, and puts it in. However the difficulty in each play was remarkably difference. Henrik wasnt set, Miller was, therefore Nylanders was a harder play.

-Inferno

All I am asking for in tomorrows game.

-Inferno

Were we screwed out of the game? Yeah, probably. Have the refs been trying to give games to the Sabres? No.

While the reffing on that 1 play where Isbister was incorrectly (or softly if you will) called for goaltending interference to disallow a goal was horrid, the reffing en masse was actually quite good. Although I couldnt see the Betts penalty on replay, I will trust that it was a good call because I feel theyve made some good calls all game long.

Were both Sabres goals legit? Absolutely. They played well for those 2 plays and snatched victory from the jaws of defeat. Thats what good teams do, and nobody has ever said they arent a good team.

Now all we have to do is be the 1. By being the 1, I am talking about being the approximately 1 in 5 teams that lose a game 5 that come back to win a series. Its possible, but its unlikely. Either way, how can you not be proud of these guys? Win or lose they give you everything they have, they never say die, and they are classy as classy can be (sans Avery). I look forward to game 6, but more importantly for me, I smile at the bright future ahead of us.

-Inferno

Lets see, bad call to take away a goal? Check

Giving up a goal with the win within grasp? Check

Going to overtime? Check.

Ive been a Ranger fan my whole life. I am not surprised they scored there, its just what I expect to happen cheering for this franchise my entire life. We are just snake bitten.

Although this is going to overtime, it isnt over….even if we lose. Weve proved we can play these guys, and we can beat these guys.

Lets recover and play hard.

-Inferno

Ugh - Rangers@Sabres - G5 - Second Period Thoughts…

Posted by inferno272 on May 4th, 2007

Ugh, ugh, ugh, ugh, ugh, ugh.

I dont know if they showed it on the MSG feed, but on the VS feed, Jagr looked hurt. REAL bad. He could barely lift his left over the lip to get into the bench area for intermission. He’s hurt bad. I just hope its something like a charlie horse, but his reaction wasnt that of intense pain (what you expect from a charlie horse) it was that of being unable to move his leg properly. I think it was his left leg, but i am not positive.

We played much better in that period, but it will all be for naught if Jaromir can’t play.

-Inferno

I am scared. I’ve been nervous all throughout this series, but I dont know if I have been scared as I am now. Why am I scared? I think the Sabres have figured out how to defeat our trap. Or at least for 20 of the past 40 minutes, theyve done it with relative ease. Once these guys get past our trap, they are just smoking us with some pretty moves. I think what they are doing is keeping a guy deep near OUR blueline all the time and daring the Rangers to send in their defenseman to create numbers in the offensive zone. If the Rangers do it and dont score or control the puck, the Sabres have a ready made breakaway/numbers. A few times I even saw them leave 2 guys up high. Very strange to see a team play so risky defensively to try to generate offense. Rangers have to be smart and make sure their D is staying back and not falling for the bait and trying to pinch in and help the offense. If we can do that, we should be able to keep this one close.

So yeah, I am still really scared.

-Inferno