Im eating my dinner here at the same time so this one is going to be a bit abrupt, but that was a good period of hockey.? Although the Pack gave up the lone goal, off of a poor turnover no less, they still played very very good hockey.? Theyve been unlucky, but im ok with that, you make your own luck sometimes.
Jas over at the HF boards had this to say:
“I have a theory. I wonder if next year, we don’t see anyone come up from Hartford, and we see the influx of kids from juniors - the likes of Staal, Sauer, Dupont, Pyatt and Anisimov are added to Dubinsky, Korpikoski, Callahan, Byers and Baranka - who will get time with this crop so further chemistry builds. The basic core plays another year together, Jagr and his crew finish up one more year, and the wave of kids starts in summer 2008. If that happens, there’s going to be another year of teeth-gnashing on HF.”?
I think that is actually a pretty good way of doing things, but I dont see the Rangers just all of a sudden dumping players and bringing in 5 rookies or something like that.? I still think its going to be a phasing in process.? I expect to see Callahan and Staal with the big club next year, and I think youll see more kids being put in year after year.
The problem is, which i think Jas is alluding to, that the current crop of Rangers dont play hockey this way, and perhaps some of the big clubs bad habits may start effecting these kids.? Strange to say, but its true.
-Inferno
Rangers Review | No Comments »